Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders Different treatments, similar mechanisms?
25 important questions on Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders Different treatments, similar mechanisms?
What is the aim of CBT in the treatment of anxiety disorders?
What components might be included in CBT for anxiety disorders? (8)
2. Self-monitoring
3. Relaxation
4. Cognitive restructuring
5. Behavioral experiments
6. Imaginal and in vivo exposure
7. Weaning of safety signals
8. Response and relapse prevention
What does psychological flexibility mean?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What components are included in ACT? (5)
2. Creative hopelessness (recognize that past efforts have not worked and have led them to avoidance)
3. Life values work
4. Value-guided exposure (e.g. epitaph to discover values)
5. Behavioral willingness/committed action (behaving according to chosen values in the face of painful thoughts and feelings that may arise)
What is an important implication of the relational frame theory (RFT)? (The theory that ACT is based on)
What does the central ACT-component of cognitive defusion teach?
How is language associated with psychopathology due to RFT?
What is the relation between ACT and RFT?
What is the criticism of ACT on cognitive restructuring in CBT?
How are cognitive restructuring and cognitive defusion/acceptance related despite apparent differences? (4)
2. By the notion of thoughts as facts by proposing that anxiety-related thoughts are hypotheses, the same distance can be created as in cognitive defusion
3. Both ACT and CBT require additional thinking (self-talk/coaching)
4. Both therapies may risk thought suppression, but they may also both facilitate exposure and therefore reduce experiential avoidance
What are the risks of ACT? (2)
2. Cognitive defusion does not specify which thoughts to defuse. Instructing them to defuse thought that get in the way of living a valued live return to the notion of thoughts as good and bad.
Why would component and mediational analysis of ACT to address the utility of cognitive defusion & acceptance be useful?
How can an increased sense of prediction and control be a core feature of ACT, even though it states that: ''Control is the problem, not the solution?'' (2)
2. By decreasing aversive internal symptoms through acceptance, acceptance may increase clients' sense of mastery and control over such symptoms.
Why may it not be truly feasible to have a primary treatment motivation or end goal other than fear reduction?
How is mindful observation linked to predictability?
What critique and development within CBT make that processes within CBT can now be seen as more equal to act?
What could still be seen as a difference between CBT and ACT in acceptance and willingness?
How is valued living addressed implicitly in CBT? (2)
2. Behavioral exposure to feared situations that likely represent personally valued behaviors may lead to anxiety reduction, which increases the likelihood of engagement in previously avoided, valued-behaviours
How is valued living addressed directly in ACT? (2)
2. May lead to behavioral exposure and hence to anxiety reduction (values-driven behavior that reduces anxiety likely reinforces valued living)
Why are values-based and anxiety-reduction goals not mutually exclusive? (2)
2. No evidence that promoting anxiety symptom reduction in CBT vs. valued living in ACT results in different therapy outcomes
In what way may the relationship between symptom reduction and valued living be conceptualized as a mediation analysis? (2)
2. Increases in value-driven behavior may heighten perceived control and reduce anxiety symptoms via direct exposure
What is important regarding the timing of the measurement of mediators in mediation analysis with the aim of finding out the pathways of ACT and CBT? (2)
2. There could be different point in treatment for the different therapies depending on the therapy strategies, individual variables or the particular treatment approach
What are important considerations in the choice of which mediator to measure? (3)
2. Measuring the same mediation measures for CBT and ACT facilitates the examination of shared and distinct processes of change
3. Cognitive and attentional processes may be mediational pathways with the potential to illuminate similarities and differences (attentional processes are central in anxiety)
What is needed to research whether the potentially different pathways and processes of change in ACT and CBT produce the same level of symptom and life improvement?
In what way does CBT inherently contain elements of acceptance? And how is this linked to emotional processing? (2)
2. The aim to demonstrate clients that they can tolerate fear and anxiety of violate exposure-outcome expectancies involves the ACT notion of ''acting with anxiety''
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding