Collaborative and sharing economy - Artikel: Debating the sharing economy

4 important questions on Collaborative and sharing economy - Artikel: Debating the sharing economy

In the article Debating the shared economy, Schor discusses boosters and critics review. Elaborate on his.

Boosters argue sharing economy provides efficiency, lowers carbon foodprints.

Critics argue that sharing economy facilitates economic self-interest and exploitation.

Schor differentiates market orientation and market structure. What is the difference in those?

Market orientation refers to being profit or non profit oriented. Market structure refers to B2P or P2P. In which B2P is related to maximum revenue per transaction, and P2P is related to money by commission.

What are the SE potential and drawbacks according to Schor?

Potential:
- Allocate value fairly
- Democratically organized
- Reduce ecologic footprint
- Bring people together
- New households model, diversify income, goods and services

Drawback:
- Business as usual
- Technology is as good as in which political and social context it is used.

She argues that pro sharing is blind for the dark side, and critics are too cynical.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Schor distinguishes market structure and market orientation. Given this, arrange the following in the correct box:
- Food swaps, time banks
- Zipcars
- Market spaces
- Relay Rides, Airbnb

Structure
P2P, B2P

orientation
Profit or non profit


- Food swaps, time banks (P2P & non profit)
- Zipcars (B2P & profit)
- Market spaces (B2P & Non profit, often G2P)
- Relay Rides, Airbnb (P2P & profit)
-

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo