Democracy and Dictatorship - Evaluating measures of democracy and dictatorship

3 important questions on Democracy and Dictatorship - Evaluating measures of democracy and dictatorship

Which particular measure is appropriate will depend heavily on the specific objective or research question. We also often evaluate measures in terms of their:

  • Conceptualization
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Replicability

The three measures differ in their conceptualization of democracy and dictatorship, in regard to whether they employ:

  • A minimalistic or substantive view of democracy
-> The DD and Polity IV measures adopt a minimalist view, whereas Freedom House adopts a more substantive view.
  • A dichotomous or continuous view of democracy
-> DD employs a dichotomous conceptualization of democracy and dictatorship, whereas both Polity IV and Freedom House employ a continuous conceptualization.

Validity refers to the extent to which our measures correspond to the concepts that they are intended to reflect. Three issues arise:

  • Attributes: which and how many attributes are determined that make up the abstract concept under consideration.
  • Aggregation issues: how to aggregate or combine these attributes into a single measure of the concept (adding etc)
  • Measurement level:
    • Nominal: classifies observations into discrete categories that must be mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (DD)
    • Ordinal: rank-orders observations along some dimension
    • Interval: places observations on a scale so we can tell how much more or less of the thing being measured it exhibits (Polity IV and Freedom House).

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo