(False) confessions

10 important questions on (False) confessions

Why false confessions? Mccormick?

.The introduction of a confession makes the other aspects of a trial in court superfluous, and the real trial, for all practical purposes, occurs when the confession is obtained (McCormick, 1972, p. 316

What is the history of false confessions?

Confession across ERs have different evolution in  16th 17th century all confessions were  restrictions like tortutre. tfhe legal practitioner used oppresive techniques no limits were on this. Every confession was fine for them. starting from 19th century the legal system started to be more sceptical to type of confession and techniques. So they started not to accept all confessions. They questioned the reliability. 20th centru legal practionarioner the evalution is need to be done case by case if they are reliable

Miranda warning waiver

Mirande waning waiver
Mirande vs. arizona 1966
the police wanys to continue the intrergation. legal practitioner has to lead the suspect known that theuy ca conceal or can be quite. it is called the mirande warning because it was based on mirande vs arizona in 1966. it lead to jurors to understand that it is important to have this information for the suspect. the mirande warning waiver is a statement from the police that they have the right to remain silent etc. We need to ndelrine this right to the suspect.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is the debate around the miranda waiver?

However there is quite a big debate two sides of scholars.
side: people that are quite critical to the mirande warning, in the last years there is a decrease in confessions.

side: believe that the mirande waring is important and that the decrease is not significant the mirande warning is imprtant to civilise people and also legal practioners.

even if there is a debate we all agree that there needs to be more investigation. even is there is debate both sides agree that we need more info.

Why do innocent suspects waive rights?

.Innocent suspects waive their rights:
     1. No prior felony more likely to waive,  innocent people without criminal history because people yhat are already interrogated are more prone to ask aout it.
     2. “Transparency Illusion” (Gilovich et al., 1998),
  1. nnocent suspects, w believe a delusion that people will trust is it is the transparency illusion. we think that listeners are prone to believe thatb what we say is true.
this is way innocent people do not ask about the mirande warning.

Confirmation bias, nickerson 1998?

confirmation bias in this bias consist the fact that people have priority, they wil search info that confirms their believes. confirmation bias nickerson 1998.

  Beliefs about the target
Behaving in such a way that conforms beliefs
Target responds in turn, confirming the beliefs

What facotrs do observational studies underline?


haracteristics of the suspec
contextual factor
duration of the detention technique used type of interaction


Perception of proof
External pressure
Internal pressure

Types of false confessions why we give them

voluntary - people can confess falsy for several reasons: people confess because of a pathologically desire for notoriety
  • need self punishment, shame and guilt they want to self punish.
  • inability to distinguish lies and reality, the suspect has mental redardation or disorders.
  • desie to protect person

Where do we look at when legal practioners have to undertsand if the confession is reliable or not?

two factors
  1. personal risk factor, personality , age, mental retardation, pychopathologuy
  2. situation risk factors, external, phicicial custody and isolation, vonformtation, minimization.

Cconsequences of confession evidence?

.Juries have to consider the voluntariness of confessions and discount those they see as coerced
However, several wrongful convictions in which false confessions are in evidence lead to three errors:
    1. Common sense leads people to expect self-serving behavior and, in turn, to trust confessions
    2. Fundamental attribution error: Tendence to make dispositional attributions for a person’s actions without      considering situational factors
    3. Believing to be able to recognize false confessions
Errors not limited to juries

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo