Lie detection

16 important questions on Lie detection

How frequent do we lie and what what and who sertona and levine?

sertona en levine tried to understand how often we lie in everyday life and what topics. on average we lie twice or once a day. the act of lying is quite frequent. the likely hood to lie is with uyoung people more prone. we lie about irrelevant info in everyday life we lie in social interactions.

Riethuis et al on frequency of lies?

.65.5%, on average, once or twice a day
56.3% falsely denying that something happened
79.5% and 70.5% to avoid conflict and punishment, respectively
this is further investigated in eithuis et al 2020
the beliefs people have about memory and our human deceptor behavuoir.In this survey it was found out that 65,5 on average once or twice a day. 56,3 false denial deceptive strategy. people report type of lies were related to willingness to avoid conflict and punishment. why do other people lie during the day. the want to give positive perception of themselves. 

Scientifique evidence how good we are at detection lies?


•Correct Lie-Truth discrimination
•Percentage based on 24,483 judgments – 206 studies
•Very robust finding - found considering studies using different paradigms, variables, and samples
our accuracy is 54%, this means our ability is just slightly better than tossing a coin. this also related to our ability to detecting lies and truth, when we detect thrithfull 61% and detecting lies, 47%. why because they found we are prone to cognitive bias,
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Why are we and experts bad at detecting lies?

Because lie detection founded on the people’s subjective experience and commonsense. Specifically:
- emotional features
- cognitive complexity of the story
- paraverbal aspects

Cognitive complexity of the story


•Consistent
•Truthfulness
•Detailed
•Vividness

Eckamn on lie detection?

poineer work ekman on lie detection:
  • emotions and emotion identification because of an evolutionary aim.emotions are signals we use to communicate with other people.we experience the same emotions. we are beagle to detect emotion, because culture plays a role. people started to think we are good at detecting emotion and thus we can detect lies. this emotions are also called non verbal cues.
  • facial expression
  • laypeople refine their capacity to identify others emotional expression everydat and based on culture.

What is exceptive bias?

expextive : if we believe something is deceptive we think all related info is deceptive.
representative: we believe if person is a liar we do not trust any statemen

Fiacial appreance bias?

facial appearance: we trust baby faces more, charactics that remind us of babies we think they are honest.

What is fundamental attribution?

fundamental attribution: we make assumptions we do not try to understand the charactics of the person, we make judgment based on ther information of suspects. we do not care about charactics of the person.

Can we train ability to detect lies?

.Driskell (2012) found a small positive effect of training
Good training needs to take into account theoretical knowledge, practice opportunity, and feedback
Kassin & Fong (1999) and Meissner & Kassin (2001) found that training made worse deception detection

Other techniques to train ability to detect lies?

-Training in interview techniques (Vrji, 2004):
For instance, cognitive load approach can increase accuracy to 71% (Vrji et al., 2017)
-Combining types of cues (Vrji & Mann, 2004):
   Increase to 70% (Hartwing & Bond, 2014)
-Considering baselines (Bond & DePaulo, 2006)

Verbal lie detection methods?

verbal
  1. criteria-based content analysis CBCA
  2. reality monitoring RM
  3. verifiability approach VA liars report different cues.

What are the 4 CBCA 4 areas?

CBCA criteria
in 4 areas:
  • general charatics
  • specific information of the vent
  • content peculiarity
  • information related to motivation
  • ( in addition, specific elements of the crime.)

.REALITY MONITORING (rm; johnson et al:, 1988)

Based on memory theory (Johnson & Raye, 1981): Real vs imagined events


reality monitoring is verbal credibility assessment the criteria are 39 items.
6 main categories related to
  • contextual info
  • sensory infor
  • emotional
  • clarity vividness and reconstructablity
  • cognitive operations.



this approach is based on studies on real and imagined memories. the idea is when a statement contains  perceptual and contextual information, spatial details and temporal details,truthfull
less concrete, less details and allot of cognitive operations we have a false statement. actually this studies have some times been critized. So not only the problem is related to research but also to the possibility of a false conclusion.

.VERIFIABILITY APPROACH (VA; NAHARI ET AL., 2012)

.Based on two assumptions:
Liars provide many details
Liars avoid mentioning too many details out of fear

accuracy 61-88%

What is the polygrapgh do? (Physiological)


1.Polygraph
● Does not detect lies, but physiological responses assumed to reflect deception

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo