MEMORY DISTORTIONS - False memories AND Eyewitness testimony

26 important questions on MEMORY DISTORTIONS - False memories AND Eyewitness testimony

.what are omission erros?

.When we are not able to correctly recall event-related details: OMISSION ERRORS

Commission errors/false memories?

.When we recall event-related details (or even the whole event) never experienced: COMMISSION ERRORS/FALSE MEMORIES

Ted talk elizabeth loftus


men was convicted the victim was sure he was it. but the real rapist was found. The man started a law suit and died of a heart attack. allot of people are convicted on a false memory. The car experiement, witnesses told that the cars drove harder than they did. people have difficulty with recognising people. when you give them mis information there memory gets disorientated. contamination of our memory is this called. most of these situation involve a psycho therapy like imagination or hypnosis, exposure to false information etc.
  • emotion
  • details
  • confidence
doesnt mean it really happened
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What kind of false memories are therE?

  • spontaneous: arise without a assumption or suggestion. the are caused by the subject.
  • Suggestive: pressure and suggestion.

.Pictures and Videos (e.g., Moritz et al., 2006; Peters et al., 2013)
spontaenous false memories?

Another method spontaneous memories
Pictures and videos: similar to the drm paradigm, researcher vcreated a more stimuli like videos and pictures. It also works in fases, in th efirst the watch pictures related to each other. After that they show a picture similar, but it was not present at phrase 1, but people still remembered it. The studies found that people had a tendency to also report the unshowed picture.

Why do we have spontanoues false memories?
Fuzzy Trace Theory (Brainerd et al., 2008
Associative-activation Theory (Howe et al., 2009)

Why do we have spontaeuns false memories
  • Fuzzy trace theory, brainerd et al 2088: when we encode we encode the gist trace and verbatim trace. Gist is our general information about a subject, but the verbatim is about the situation. This theory argues the verbatim traces are the ones that fade quickly because we have more traces for the gist.
  • Associative theory, howe et al  2009: memorie works like a network of nodes because of spready activation we can also activate some nodes that we never experienced, these are false.

Suggestive false memories?Misinformation Paradigm (Loftus et al., 1978)

.Suggestive false memories
Misinformation paradigm loftus, 1978
3 phases, the first one we encode pictures or a video after the encoding they are exposed to misinformation, false information about the first event.  This is a narrative or suggestive question) after that they are asked to recall the event. people reported the false information allot of times.A high amount of participant also said they said something different than they saw

Suggestive false memories luftis and pickrell, memory implementation?

memory implantation
Loftus and pickrell 1995
The memory is entirely fictief. This is most common with children. In first phase they call the parents, the child is interviewed about the event that didnt happen. the parents needed to tell the children they were lost in mall etc. 30% of children say they remember. Even UVO abduction was implantated.

Suggestive false memory: crashing memory


Crashing memory crombag er al 1996
can we create memories for traumtic events, participants have to recall a plane crash. after suggesting people said having seen pictures they didnt get show

Suggestive false memories: rumor mongering.

Rumor mongering 1998
False rumers can lead to false memories.

.suggestive false memories :Forced Confabulation (Ackil & Zaragoza, 1998)

Forced cinfabulation ackil &zaragoza 1998
The researchers tried to replicate a person under interrogation doesnt remember the details of events. Is forced to remember. The interviewer tries to force it. In the first phase they watch a video, after that they need to answer some questions but some questions werent present in the video. participants again implanted false memories. SO even forcing can alter our memory

Suggestive false memories: imagination inflation

Imagination inflation goff en roediger 1988
In first part particpants have to perform some actions, after that they need to remember them and some new ones, after that can they recognize which they performed in the first phase.

Suggestive false memories false feedback

False feedback bernstein en loftus 2009
Researcher tries to understand that we are prone to recall false memories. They asked participants to recall something, they were said that a computer could track there preference for food in childhood. the participants dnt want the food that got them sick during childhood that the computer said.

Theories for suggestive memories: source monitoring framework Johson et al.

Theories for suggestive memories
Source monitoring framework johnson et al 1993: why are we prone to have false memories.confsuoj for the sources of the diffrecnt memrory traces, we do not know the sources, the sources are known for their own charactitic. these charactics can be the same for false memories and true memories.

What are the variables that effect our memory?

.Estimator Variables
System Variables
Post-diction Variables

Estimator variable: own race bias

.Faces of their own ethnicity are better remembered than faces of another ethnicity

1.56 times greater for other-race
Holistic vs. analytic processes
  1. own race bias
A bias how you identify a race, we are much better at recognize faces of our own ethnicity. 1,56 greater. this is because we can make two different processes when we identify face holistic and analytic. Analytic when we see person of our own race. Holoistic when it is another race we are not beable each single charactis of face.

Estimator bias stress

.A high level of stress decreases the accuracy of the culprit identification and in the recollection of the event
  1. stress
    A high level of stress decreads the accuracy of the culprit identification and in the recollection of the event. The curve tells us that increase arousal we can not perform the task, stress is also a arousal so we cant perfom a task.
  2. weapon focus effect

Estimator bias: focus on weapons

  1. Focus on weapons makers harde to recall thee other elemts of the crime
it is a high emotional stimulis so we focus on that. we cant encode the other elements. mixed results: we know when task is identify the people we have nu probleme.

Modest impairment on identification, larger on description accuracy (Steblay, 1992) Mixed results from field studies (Tollestrup et al., 1994; Valentine et al., 2003)
Focus on the weapon makes harder to recall of other crime-related details (Loftus et al., 1987

Estimator bias exposure duration

.The higher the time to look at the offender, the better his/her recognition.Correct identification from 12s to 45s, but when target-absent mistaken identifications remained high (Memon et al., 2003).
  1. exposre duration
The higher the time to look at the offender the better his/her recognition
correct identification from 12s to 45s but when target-absent mistaken identifications remained high

Estimator bias: retention interval

.The higher is the interval of time between the crime and its recollection, the lower is the accuracy.
retention interval
The high the interval of time between the crime and its recollection the lower the accuracy, we forget fast after the encoding, so we forget the high majority.

Estimator bias: Disguise, Non-transformed faces more accurately recognizable (Shapiro & Penrod, 1986)

.The more the face is not visible, the worse is its recognition.
  1. Disguise
The more the face is not visible the worse its recognition.
  1. Intoxication level

Estimator bias: intoxication level.

.Alcohol Myopia theory: Intoxicated witnesses worse only in target-absent identification (Dysart el al., 2002
  1. Intoxication level
research shows when we have identify a culprit, alcohol mypoa theory

System variables: interviewing witnesses

  1. interviewing witnesses
Variable that uses the memory of the einterviewde, they are free to recall everything. use of correct method avoiding false memories, false confessions. we need to avoid misleading information.

System varaibles: identification of the suspect?

  1. identification of the suspect
            it is recognition task, line up is often used. one suspect the others are fillers. The suspect is the target. the others are the fillers. The line up can be live. In other cases we can have lin eup of pictures. There is target presen vs. target absent, suspect isnt there. people can make incoorect observation. and others errors.

Post diction variables:

.Different factors can affect the relationship between accuracy-confidence
correlation, associating is around 41 quite low., different factors can affect the relationship between accuracy-confindance.

Post diciton variables: response latency

.Time to provide the memory
.the time we need to recall an event. we need around 10-12 sec to recall correct other research says 5-29 we know for sure in less 5 sec we are not be able to make a correct correlation of the event.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo