Introduction of Malingering; Lying and Memory

16 important questions on Introduction of Malingering; Lying and Memory

Frencency lies in legal context?

frequency of lies in legal context
this is very complicated, sometimes we realise eventually that people provide false info in other situations the person stays consistent. we know the false denials is used with offender 56% , victims we have no percentage, we have opposing results on victims. some say that victims deny for 50% other said higher percentage similar to offenders. Huge debtas on the percentage. because it is strictly on sexual abuse with children. deniers in victims usually victim of sexual crime.

False denials in offenders? And feigned amnesia?

.False Denials:
56% in offenders
Very common also in victims


Feigned Amnesia:
30% in offenders

Why do offenders give false denials and feigned amnesia?

.To minimize involvement in the crime
To provide a false alibi
To protect him/herself or someone
To interfere with the police investigation and trial proceeding
To avoid the re-experience of traumatic feelings
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Does lying effect peoples memory

Riethuis it does.
Each deceptive strategy has a unique impact on memory (e.g., Ackil & Zaragoza, 2011; Gombos et al., 2012; Mangiulli et al., 2018; Otgaar et al., 2016; Polage, 2004; 2012; Viera & Lane, 2013)

What is the effect of false denial on the memory

- ommission
- denial induced forgetting
- forgetting the event

What are the effects of feigned amnesia on the memory

Forgetting for the event
ommission and comission

What is the effect of fabrication on the memory?

Commission errors
effects on beliefs.

Studies on false denials and memory Pioneering work by Vieira & Lane (2013)

.Encoding phase:
Several pictures of objects

Lying phase:
Describe or deny the objects studied and new

Honest memory phase:
Memory for lying
Memory for the items

.Investigation with crime-related stimuli by Otgaar and colleagues


- Encoding phase:
Video of a crime

-Baseline memory phase
-Lying phase:
Simulated police interview (denials vs truth)



Denial-Induced Forgetting (DIF; Otgaar et al., 2014): Forgetting not for memory for the crime but for the interview

Study false denial and memory Batista et al

.Battista et al. (2021a) investigated whether falsely denying can have different memory outcomes based on the difficulty to lie

Replicated Denial-Induced Forgetting in simple situation
In complex situation, false denials can lead to memory undermining for the crime (i.e., less correct details and more commissions)

encoding phase -> baseline memory ->lying phase ->

   Replicated Denial-Induced Forgetting in simple situation
In complex situation, false denials can lead to memory undermining for the crime (i.e., less correct details and more commissions)

Studies on feigned amnesia and memory

.Several studies with different types of instructions (e.g, “Describe in writing the course of events so as to evade responsibility, as if you did not remember very well”; “Minimize your responsibility by simulating a memory disorder. Thus, try to describe events in such a way so it looked like you have great difficulties in remembering what happened”)
encoding phase -> lying phase
Those who feigned amnesia less able to subsequently recall the crime -omissions or commissions depending on the instructions
one group truth one group liars.

Study frabrication and memory ackil and zaragoza?

.Pioneering work by using forced-confabulation paradigm (Ackil & Zaragoza, 1998)



Encoding phase:
Video


Lying phase:
Tell the truth vs People forced to response even when no memory

Those who self-generated (fabricated) questions were more prone to recall their own self-generated information  commissions

What are other studies on fabrication?

.Pickel (2004) found that impairment only for the self-generated details and not the whole event
Chrobak & Zaragoza (2008; 2012) replicated these results also after 8 weeks
Riesthuis et al. (2022) found that motivation (high vs low) to lie does not influence the typical mnemonic effects of fabrication
Battista et al. (2021b) investigated whether fabricating can have different memory outcomes based on the difficulty to lie and found that fabricating in simple situation can have detrimental effect on the memory for the interview

Why does lying undemrine the memory

.Different theoretical explanations:
Inhibition processes
Source Monitoring Framework
Memory and Deception Framework

.SOURCE MONITORING FRAMEWORK (SMF; Johnson et al., 2013)

.To explain mainly fabrication outcomes
Evaluation of various sources of information by judging the memory characteristics (e.g., perceptual, contextual, affective) of these sources
When an imagined event shares similarities with memories for a real event, difficulty to distinguish between the two sources of information

Practical implications from the source monitoring framework?

.To evaluate the reliability of witnesses, suspects, and victims’ statements in order to avoid:
    1. To accept statements made by liars as reliable and true just because they come forward with the truth
    2. Wrongful convictions because of statements
    3. To conduct erroneous interrogation trying to unveil information that will never be retrieved

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo