L4: Evidence based nutrition the case of sugar

23 important questions on L4: Evidence based nutrition the case of sugar

What is the recommendation of the WHO for SSB to countries?

To put a SSB tax on SSB.

What did real world evaluation studies show about the SSB in the UK?

In the UK, a ssb tax was implemented. They had 3 tax brackets: high sugar, medium sugar, low sugar. They saw that the sales of high sugar beverages went down and low went up. 2 things could have happened:
- People didnt buy high sugar anymore and bought low sugar
- the industry changed their recipe to be in lower tax bracket

What are 3 advantages of real-world evaluation studies?

- its the most convincing evidence of the effect
- The total effect of the tax can be captured, how does the consumer act? How does the industry act? Do people get the message? Were there reformulations?
- No issues in implementing the study, because its already done.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What are 2 disadvantages of real-world evaluation studies?

- You dont only capture the effect of the tax, but there could be other factors that affected the result. (confounders). You can adjust for this, but it can never capture the real effect.
- You also dont have any contorl group

What did simulation studies find about SSB tax?

If you higher the price, the demand will go down. But you will never know which beverage the consumer then buys. You hope its water but you cannot know.

Simulation studies found that the consumption of SSB in younger population will go down with higher price. For older population it will not matter so much.

Name 3 advantages of simulation studies for SSB tax

- you can highlight some key considerations surrounding taxes
- You can compare the effect of different tax options easily.
- its computer modeling, so there are no implementation issues.

Name 2 disadvantages of simulation studies for SSB tax.

-The accuracy of the simulation is limited by the quality of the data for dietary, health and economic aspect. You need a lot of good quality data for this.
- you are relying on many assumptions to do a simulation. The health effect is very complicated, so its hard to simulate this.

What was the method of the experimental study virtual supermarket?

Control: 9% vat on all products
SSB tax: 9% tax on all products, 0,21 cents on SSB, 0,28 cents on SSB
nutrient profiling tax: 9% vat on all products, 20% additional tax on unhealthy products.
The virtual supermarket compared the consumer behaviour of all groups with eachother. They asked what the consumer would normally buy.

What was the results of the virtual supermarket for the SSB tax? And for the nutrient profiling tax?

SSB tax: bought less of SSB
nutrient profiling tax: bought less of SSB, less kcal in general and more healthy products (fruits and vegetables)

Name the 5 domains and an example of political and public acceptability beliefs around the implication for SSB tax based on the systematic review from Eykelenboom

- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness: those who really love soft drinks would save money from other sources to buy them anyway
- appropriateness: ive drank SSb my life and ive never been overweight. Its no use doing this
- Economic and socio-economic benefit:having this type of tax brings in revenue.
- Policy adoption and implementation: it will be difficult to implement. The industry is lobbying the government all the time.
- public mistrust: an EEB tax is just a government money generating scheme

What was the result of the quantitative analysis of the public acceptebility for a SSB tax?

42% supports an SSB tax, the % is lower when the reasoning is as a strategy to reduce obesity, but when the revenue is appropriately used (to lowe healthy food cost), more people (66%) support an SSB tax.

What are the 4 recommendations from the systematic review that studied the acceptebility for a SSB tax?

1. Address inconsistencies between identified beliefs and literature
2. Use raised revenue for health initiatives
3. Communitcate transparently about the true tax purpose
4. Generate political priority for solutions to the challenge to implementation

How much en% do we get daily from mono and disaccarides (sugar)?

About 21 en%

What is the prevalence of overweight in the netherlands (adult and children)?

50% adults are overweight or obese
13% of children are overweight or obese

What is the opinion of the dutch public about an SSB tax in general, as a way to reduce overweight and if revenue is used for health initiatives?

In general, about 40% accept an SSB tax. To reduce obesity its the same amount. When the SSB tax is used for health initiatives, more people accept it (55%)

What are the dutch opinions about obesity as a problem and the contribution of an SSB tax for obesity?

70% think obesity is a problem int he netherlands
50% think an SSB tax would contirbute to improving peoples health
50% think an SSB tax is feasable in the netherlands

Name 4 characteristics of the group of dutch people that think an SSB tax is not acceptable.

- low education level
- overweight
- moderate or high SSB consumption
- household with adolecents  
These people are an important target for the SSB tax.

What 3 kinds of research are still needed to study about the SSB tax?

- multi-country surveys to enable high quality cross-country comparisons
- longitudinal and experimental studies should explore how to change the public acceptability of an SSB tax.
- more research on public acceptability of other environmental interventions to reduce obesity.

So if 50% of dutch people accept an SSB tax, why isnt there one now? Name 4 reasons

We dont really know why. But:
- There is a lot of lobbying from the industry to prevent this.
- difficulty in defining SSB is also a part
- there is a perceived public opposition to SSB tax
- limited advocacy for a SSB tax

Name 4 reasons in favor of an SSB tax in the Netherlands

- Increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in the netherlands
- The industry have shown dissapointing results from voluntary actions to lower the sugar amount in beverages
- its an international recommendation
- it has a solid legal framework basis to implement it. So it is doable.

What age group of people comsume the most SSB?

Age 18-50 year, about 200 g of SSB a day.
people aged 51-64 drink about 100 g a day
people aged 65-79 drink about 75 g a day.
men drink more than women.
The median amount of all people is about 120 g of SSB a day.

What are 3 advantages and 3 disadvantages of a prospective cohort?

Advantages:
- you can investigate multiple effects of a single exposure
- its useful when the exposure is rare
- No selection or recall bias

Disadvantages:
- its expensive and time consuming
- Not efficient for rare diseases
- Confounders have to be taken into account
- The cause and effect is unclear

Name 3 types of studies that have been done to SSB tax

- real-world studies
- simulation studies
- experimental study (virtual supermarket)

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo