Foundations of Research Methods - pages 4-29 - Research design and causality - b Internal validity
35 important questions on Foundations of Research Methods - pages 4-29 - Research design and causality - b Internal validity
What is the key question in internal validity?
How do you establish internal validity?
What are the characteristic of internal validity?
- Is only relevant to the specific study in question
- is not concerned with whether the program you implemented was what you wanted to implement or whether what you observed was what wanted to observed
- is possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct or external validity
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What are single-group threats?
What are social threats?
What is a pretest-posttest single group design?
What is a single-group design?
What are history threats?
What are maturation threats?
- When there is a change in a desired outcome level or a change in outcome, due to normal maturation or internal growth in the outcome rather than as a result of your program.
- consists of all of the changes in the outcome that would occur naturally with the passage of time.
What is the difference between history threats and maturation threats?
What is a testing threat?
What are characteristics of an instrumentation threat?
- Only in a pretest - posttest situation (like testing threat)
- part or all of any pre-post gain is due to the change in instrument, rather than to your program
- is also likely when the instrument is essentially a human observer (tired or bored overtime)
- Change in instrumentation leads to the outcome
What is a mortality threat?
What is another name for mortality threat?
What is a regression threat?
- A statistical phenomenon that falsely makes it appear that your group changed to be more like the overall population between the pretest and posttest.
- means that the pretest average for the group in your study will appear to increase or improve (relative to the overall population) even if you don't do anything to them, even if you never give them a treatment.
- You can only go up or down from phenomenon
How do you deal with these single-group threats to internal validity?
- Through research design
- incorporate a second group (control group): one group receive the program and the other one doesn't (it becomes a multiple-group design)
What is the key internal validity issue of the multiple-group design?
What is the only multiple-group threat to internal validity?
What is a selection threat?
What is selection-history threat?
- The way the groups differ is with respect to their reactions to certain historical events that may occur between the pretest and the posttest.
- Example: low-income folks (no health insurance) stop smoking and high-income folks (health insurance) do not stop smoking in the antismoking cessation group after reading the Surgeon General's report about health consequences of smoking.
What is the difference between history and maturation threats?
What is selection-testing threat?
What is selection-instrumentation threat?
- The test changes differently for the two group
What is selection-mortality threat?
What is selection-regression threat?
- It might happen if one group was more extreme on the pretest that the other.
What are the advantages when you move from a single group to a multiple group?
How can you create two groups that are truly comparable?
What are social threats to internal validity?
What are the major social interaction threats to internal validity?
- Diffusion or imitation of treatment
- Compensatory rivalry
- Resentful demoralization
- Compensatory equalization of treatment
What is compensatory rivalry?
What is resentful demoralization?
What is compensatory equalization of treatment?
How can you minimize the social interaction threats?
- By training administrators in the importance of perserving group membership and not instituting equalizing programs ( researchers will never be able to eliminate entirely the possibility that human interactions are making it more difficult to assess cause-effect relationships)
What are the four alternative ways to minimize any threats to any type of validity?
- By argument
- By measurement or observation
- By analysis
- By preventive action
What is the most straightforward way to rule out a potential threat to validity?
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
