Prohibition of the use of powe - cyber attacks

7 important questions on Prohibition of the use of powe - cyber attacks

What is the generally accepted interpretation of article 2 (4) UN Charter ?

·that only those interventions that produce psychical damage will be regarded as an unlawful use of force.

How can Attacks without physical damage being regulated by international law?

·Attacks without physical damage can be regarded as unlawful on the basis of the principle of non-intervention that is part and parcel of customary international law.

Why was the attack in Estonia not regarded as unlawful?

·Because there was no psychical damage, the attack cannot be regarded as an unlawful use of force for the purpose of article 2 (4).
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Who can the attack on Iran be regarded as unlawful?

It’s unclear whether the virus has actually cause physical damage to the centrifuges. Only than the attack can be regarded as an unlawful use of force and a violation of art. 2 (4) can be established.

When does a unlawful intervention occur?

·An unlawful intervention can only occur where the physical territory of a state has been violated.

When is intervertion wrongful according to the ICJ?

·intervention is wrongful when it uses methods of coercion in regard to choices which must remain free ones’.

Which 2 questions must be adressed in order to establish if the non-intervention principle is violated?

1.Is the intervention intended to force the victim state into a change of policy?
2.Bears the application of coercion upon matter which a state is entitled to freely determine itself?

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo