Individual Investors

18 important questions on Individual Investors

Barber and Odean (2002) link experience and overconfidence

- what is it they research and what is their main finding?
- what do they find?
- what about the amount of underperformance in percentages?


Barber and Odean (2002) link experience and overconfidence:

-Investors who switch to online trading perform well prior to going online, beating the market by more than 2%.
-After going online, they trade more actively, more speculatively, and less profitably
- underperformance by more than 3% annually.

The buying decision: attention effect.

what is the attention effect?

name 4 attention drawing events

Individuals have a limited amount of attention that they can devote to investing.

Attention effect: When buying a stock, people do not search systematically through the thousands of listed shares until they find a good “buy” and they typically buy a stock that has caught their attention.


Attention drawing events:
-Extreme past performance, whether good or bad.
-Stocks with abnormally high trading volume.
-Stocks with news announcements.
-Media coverage (Fang, Peress and Zheng, 2014).

Engelberg and Parsons (2011): Media and trading.

what are the three findings in Engelberg and Parsons ( 2011) that they find.

hint:
related to media coverage
firm size
extreme earnings surprises

Engelberg and Parsons (2011): Media and trading.

Local media coverage increases local trading volume by 37% to 75%.

Larger firms experience higher turnover.

Extreme earnings surprises result in more trading activity.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

The selling decision: disposition effect

what is the dispotion effect.

Disposition effect: investors have a preference for selling stocks that have increased in value since bought (winners) relative to stocks that have decreased in value since bought (losers).

Give 2 different explanations of the disposition effects and for each approach give two different reasons.

1 Rational explanations: Tax considerations. Information on future performance.

2 Behavioral explanation: Irrational belief in mean reversion. Prospect theory and mental accounting (narrow framing).

What is the prospect theory of the dispostion effect? give 2 reason whilst looking at it from the lens of prospect theory.

Narrow framing: every stock is evaluated separately.

Gains and losses satiate: concavity and convexity of prospect theory value function.

French (2008): Development of the mutual fund industry.

what is the development that French(2008) examines?

A Dramatic shift from direct holdings to mutual funds (importance of 401k plans).

What is a mutual fund.

Mutual funds

Mutual fund - investment company that brings together a group of people and invests their money. Each investor owns a portion of the holdings of the fund.

Return-chasing flows of mutual fund investors Sirri and Tuffano (1998) report nonlinear performance-flow relationship:

what do Sirri and Tuffano ( 1998) report on nonlineair performance-flow relationships?

- For funds in the bottom 80th percentile, there is no pronounced penalty for extremely poor relative performance.

- However, the performance-flow relationship is very strong for funds whose historic performances place them in the top 20th percentile in the prior year.

Individual investors and the financial industry: Chang, Solomon and Westerfield (2016).

name 2 empirical facts on investor behavior.

3 Individual investors and the financial industry: Chang, Solomon and Westerfield (2016). 

Motivation Two empirical facts on investor behavior: 1 Disposition effect in direct stock holdings. 2 Return chasing behavior in mutual fund investments.

What is Cognitive dissonance.

What are two contraty cofnitions that an investor can hold?

What are two potential action that can be taken from this?

Cognitive dissonance Cognitive dissonance – the discomfort that arises when a person recognizes that he or she makes choices and/or holds beliefs that are inconsistent with each other (Festinger, 1957).

Two contrary cognitions that an investor can hold: I am a good investor and I bought this asset for a good reason. My asset has decreased in value.

Potential actions: Update one or both cognitions so they are consistent. Alter the importance of one of the cognitions. Add a new ameliorating cognition (scapegoat).

Individual investors and the financial industry: Chang, Solomon and Westerfield (2016).

What are the three hypotheses that are being tested in Chang, Solomon and WesterField ( 2016)?

Hypotheses 1 Assets that are not delegated will display a disposition effect, while those that are delegated will display a reverse-disposition effect. This difference is due to the psychological effects of delegation rather than the economic effects.

Hypotheses 2:  If investors experience a high level of cognitive dissonance, they will display a larger disposition effect in nondelegated assets like stocks and a larger reverse-disposition effect in delegated assets like funds.


Hypotheses 3: If investors focus more on the role of the fund manager instead of their own role, they will display a larger reverse-disposition effect.

If we look at Disposition effect in trading data.

what are three findings  with respect to  the disposition effect, reverse disposition effect and base probabilities that we can make?

Disposition effect: an investor is 3.91% more likely to sell a stock if it is at a gain. Reverse-disposition effect: an investor is 6.56% less likely to sell a fund if it is at a gain. Base probabilities to sell an asset reflected in the constant. Not driven only be preferences: the results hold within the subsample of investors who simultaneously hold stocks and funds.

Disposition effect in index funds. what conclusion can we draw about index funds and poor performance of such a fund?

Index funds – same institutional details as actively managed mutual funds, but their manager is a less credible target to blame for the poor performance of the fund.

What is the experimental setting from Chang, Solomon and Westerfield ( 2016)?

what is the motivation from Chang, Solomon and Westerfield (2016)?

Motivation: control for economic differences between delegated and nondelegated portfolios, such as learning about managerial skill, moral hazard, other agency problems,


Experimental setting: Story treatment – show individuals their stated reason for a buying decision. Fire treatment – increase the salience of the intermediary.

Chang, Solomon and Westerfield.(2016) what can we say about students in the story treatment and for the fire treament, what are the different results?

In Chang, Solomon and Westerfield(2016)

Experimental disposition effect for funds

Students in the Fire treatment displayed a significantly larger reverse-disposition effect, consistent with the cognitive dissonance hypothesis.

Students in the Story treatment also displayed a significantly greater reverse-disposition effect.

What doe the story treatment do to the magnitude of the disposition effect?

Experimental disposition effect for stocks The point estimate of the stock disposition effect (0.0338) in the experiment is quite close to the estimated stock disposition effect in the individual trader data. Story treatment increases the magnitude of the disposition effect.

In Frazzini and Lamont (2008)..


what are the two hypothesis that are being tested aswell as    what do these two hypothesis entail?

Individual investors and mutual fund flows

1 Smart money hypothesis:
Some mutual fund managers have skill and some individual investors can detect that skill, and send their money to skilled managers.

2 Dumb money hypothesis:
Individual investors cannot detect skill of mutual fund managers. Mutual fund flows measure individual investor sentiment for different stocks, and high sentiment predicts low future returns.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo