Human Resource Metrics and Measurement

29 important questions on Human Resource Metrics and Measurement

What is HRA (1970-1980)?

Human Resource accounting. it was the first attempt to quantify human capital in an organization

How can we catagorize the three types of outcomes within the distal or proximal outcomes?

1. Financial and Organizational outcomes are distal outcomes measures: the distance between an HR intervention and organizational outcomes and financial outcomes is large. Therefore the effects of interventions are difficult to measure.

2. HR-related outcomes are proximal outcomes, because the effect of the intervention can directly be measured, because they're closer to the intervention.

What is a KPI?

Key performance indicator. They reflect the succes or failure in goal achieving.
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What are the three main reasons to measure HR?

1. To bring the financial, organizational and HR outcomes together and show relationship
2.  Speaking the same language
3. Convincing the rest of being part of the rest.

A. Measurement
B. Valorisation (how much is this practice actually going to bring me?) Often in terms of money.

What does an ideal HR measurement system take into account?

The interest of multiple perspectives (employee and employer)

What are the main differences of Hard and soft outcomes? In terms of:

- rigide
- indication past vs future
- distal vs proximal
- reliability / representative?

Hard outcomes are often easier to measure than soft outcomes. The results of soft HR outcomes are often long-term oriented.

Differences:

Hard HR
- More solid/rigid
- More indicative of the past
- Distal
- Reliable ?

Examples: labor productivity, efficiency ratio's, labour costs, sales volumes and net profits.


Soft HR  
- More interpretation is needed 
- Indicative for the future  
- Proximal      
- Representative / valid ?   

Examples: employee satisfaction, commitment, engagement, turnover intention.

Why is measurement crucial for organizations?

because it represents the effectiveness of certain managerial decisions

What are the 3 outcomes (output) we can balance?

  1. Financial outcomes (Shareholders/investors)
  2. Organizational outcomes (Organization)
  3. Hr-related outcomes (employees)


Based on these 3 outcomes you can judge a company's performance. There are strong relations
between the three, but they are not always aligned, because there are different stakeholders. So an ideal HR measurement system takes these interests into account.

What is HRA called nowadays and what does it focusses on?

Human capital valuation (HCV) or HR metrics.
Focus on measuring and monitoring interventions

When we talk about measuring, what is the division that we make first?

  1. Output
  2. Input

To measure specific practices (input) we can ask questions on 5 different topics

  1. Presence
  2. Intensity
  3. Importance
  4. Satisfaction
  5. Coverage

What is the focus of HR analytics?

An advanced an sophisticated analysis of large and longitudinal HRM datasets

So why measure? (Making the added value of HR measurable)

  • Making more effective (HR) management decisions (evidence-based decision making)
  • Convincing others (evidence) in making decisions
  • Setting up new interventions / shutting down interventions
  • Assessing effectiveness of (HR) interventions Tracking /monitoring / insight / predict / modify

Human Resource accounting (HRA) (70s& 80s)

The first attempt to measure and quantify the value of Human capital was for the accounting, financial, control and monitoring and investment. lt was just to monitor the people and to see if the people were a good investment for the company.

Balanced Score Card (Kaplan and Norton, 1992}

Aim is a measureable framework tor mapping an organization's assets,

The BSC is moving from the accounting part
to the strategy part. Which are linked and should be balanced

  • Financial (accounting): How do we look to our shareholders? most important
  • External/customer: How do customers see us?
  • Internal business: What must we excel at?
  • Knowledge and growth including innovation and learning. More future focused

HR scorecard Becker (2001)

Becker puts the HR function as the main starting point tor measuring HR M in an organization. lt
contains 5 key elements :

  1. The workforce success: has the worktorce accomplished the key strategie objectives?
  2. The right HR costs: is our total investment in the worktorce appropriate?
  3. The right types of HR alignment: are the HR practices aligned with the business strategy?
  4. The right HR practices: have we designed and implemented world class HR management policies?
  5. The right HR professionals: Do our HR professionals have the skills they need to design a good HR management system?

Paauwe next-generation HR scorecards

This one is much broader than the early models. Now there are also the organizational elements
included next to the HR function and practices.

  • Professional logic: focused on the expectations of line managers, employees, works councils and colleagues of HR departments.
  • Strategie logic: incorporates the expectations of the board of directors, CEO, shareholders and financiers.
  • Societal logic: focused on the expectations of works councils, trade unions, the government and other interest groups or stakeholders relevant to the organization.
  • Delivery logic: represents the cost-effectiveness of the possible

Disadvantage soft outcomes

Soft outcome scales used in practices are often artificial and lack reliability and construct validity (not properly tested)

Strategical balance theory {SBT) :

The interrest of different stakeholders must be balanced

Paauwe: unbalanced organizations (employee and employer interests are disbalanced) can restore the balance through:

1. When there are high employee interests and low employer interests:
  • Creating cost-awareness among employees
  • Information about the business activities etc.
  • Putting emphasis on service quality standard to customers.


2. When there are low employee interests and high employer interests: (more often)
  • Providing employee autonomy, training and development.
  • Good communication
  • Employment security

Paauwe: unbalanced organizations (employee and employer interests are disbalanced) can restore the balance through:

1. When there are high employee interests and low employer interests:
  • Creating cost-awareness among employees
  • Information about the business activities etc.
  • Putting emphasis on service quality standard to customers.


2. When there are low employee interests and high employer interests: (more often)
  • Providing employee autonomy, training and development.
  • Good communication
  • Employment security

Starovic and Marrr (2003) define intellectual capital in terms of:

1. Human capital: know-how, education and work-related competences/
2. Relational capita!: brands, customers and customer loyalty
3. Organizational capital: patents, copyrights, corporate culture, management philosophy and
networking systems

Wright (2001) stated that there are three types of capital

  • Human capital:  reflected in knowledge, skills and abilities of the employees.
  • Social capital: reflected in the valuable social networks and relationships between employees within the organization and social networks of employees with the outside world.
  • Organizational capital: embedded in the practices and systems in place

Employee commitment (Allen & Meyer)

  • Affective: involvement in and emotional attachment to the organization. (desirable)
  • Normative: attachment because of perceived moral obligation.
  • Continuance: attachment because of a lack of alternatives.
    • Often because of the golden cage: excellent compensation

Perceived employee justice

represents the employee's perception of the fairness of HRM in an organization.

  • Distributive justice: people's perceptions of ou tcomes or rewards and the way thatthey are allocated.
  • Procedural justice: fairness of the procedures used to determine outcome distributions or allocations. (perception, attachment)

Putting people in a controlled environment (Reliability and validity)

Reliable, but not valid

One measurement of organizational outcomes is legitimacy. What is the difference between pragmatic, moral and cognitive legitimacy?

1. Pragmatic legitimacy; a company only operates responsible because otherwise the outside world has a negative view.

2. Moral legitimacy; an organization judges its actions on responsibility because she feels obligated to.

3. Cognitive legitimacy; within an organization there is legitimacy in the business culture, strategy and structure

How can we measure organizational outcomes?

1. Productivity
2. Quality
3. Flexibility (numerical, functional, mental)
4. Legitimacy
- Innovation

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo