Emancipation of the Serfs - A Flawed Measure

11 important questions on Emancipation of the Serfs - A Flawed Measure

When was the Edict of Emancipation promulgated?

March 1861

What were the terms of the Edict of Emancipation?


Serfs were:
  1. freed from feudal obligations
  2. allotted land for their needs
  3. indebted to state and obliged to make redemption payments ot the obschina (village mir) over a 49 year period



Landlords received:
  1. compensation from the state for the land in the form of Treasury bonds

What was the peasant reaction to the Edict of Emancipation?

  1. Peasants were incredulous because they had to pay for land that they felt belonged to them because they had always tended it
  2. Many, believing that the real terms of the Emancipation had been concealed by their landlords, rioted in protest
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Why was the Edict of Emancipation onerous for the (freed!) peasantry?

  1. Lost on average 4.1 % of pre-1861 holdings
  2. In more fertile regions lost much more; eg. in Steppe provinces figure was 23.3% and Ukrane it was 30.8%

Why didn't the dvoriane benefit from the emancipation despite government measures to protect their economic interests?

Dvoriane was so heavily indebted that the financial compensation they received was in general swallowed up by the settlement of debts

What was the affect of government financial compensation being used to settle government debts on Russian industry?

There was little investment in industry and agriculture following the Emancipation; this is the opposite of what Alexander II expected and wanted

What was the impact of little change in agricultural practises after the Edict of Emancipation was passed?

The persistence of obsolete agricultural techniques exacerbated Russia's low yield. For example:
  1. Russia produced 6 hectolitres per acre of cereals at this time
  2. In contrast, France and Prussia produced more than 9
  3. Britain and Holland produced 14

What was the government's new method of peasant control after the Edict of Emancipation?

Obshchina (Mir) should control:
  1. movement of peasants; so that those who wanted to travel more than 20 miles needed an internal passport

What two parts of the Edict of Emancipation has Alexander Gerschenkron argued prevented Russian economic development?

Alexander Gerschenkron has argued that:
  1. Mir internal control contributed to the retardation of Russian economic development because it didn't allow for a freely mobile labour force
  2. Redemption payments reduced peasant purchasing power and so didn't allow for the development of industry

What is the argument for why the Edict of Emancipation helped to stimulate Russian industry?

E.M. Falkus:
  1. Between 2-3 million peasants weren't given land in the Edict of Emancipation meaning that there was a pool of available labour
  2. many internal passports were issued meaning that there was a freely mobile labour force
  3. Moreover, as redemption payments were spread over a long period, in many cases they were no higher than the rents which former serfs had paid to their landlords

What is Watt's conclusion on how the Edict of Emancipation stimulated Russian industry?

The abolition of serfdom didn't succeed in facilitating the optimum conditions for Russian economic advancement

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo