A brief history of risk assessment in sentencing - Second generation: actuarial assessment and selective incapacitation
3 important questions on A brief history of risk assessment in sentencing - Second generation: actuarial assessment and selective incapacitation
What was one of the prime criticisms launched at the early actuarial tools?
So non-recidivists classified als high risk.
How was the prime criticism on the early actuarial tool (partly) remedied?
Actuarial risk assessments compare an individual’s characteristics to a reference group and calculated risk scores reflect the degree of similarity between an individual and a group: a high-risk offender basically shares many characteristics with past recidivists and a low-risk offender shares many characteristics with past non-recidivists.
What was the evolution of crime rates and sentences in 1990's and how did this affect 'the new generation of risk assessment'?
The new generation of risk assessment challenged the dominant focus on punitive responses and incapacitation to some extent by a greater focus on treatment potential.
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding