Pre-recorded lectures

13 important questions on Pre-recorded lectures

Porter/ Bain type IO

Structure -> conduct -> Performance

5 forces -> generic strategies  -> profitability

Two central question underlie the choice of competitive strategy /  How does Porter see CA?

The first is the attractiveness of industries for long-term profitability and the factors that determine it (industry effect)


The second [FIRM EFFECT] is the determinants of relative position within an industry’ (1985: 1)

How does Porter explain differences in performance?

Industry effect
- Barriers to competition at the level of industries positively affect the average profitability of the firms in those industries

Strategic group effect
-Mobility barriers between strategic groups within anindustry positively affect the average profitability of the firms in those strategic groups (the strategicgroup effect)


Firm effect
- Positions of differentiation and/or low cost positively affect the relative profitability of individual firms within an industry or strategic group
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Major changes from 1985 Porter ->

Moving from a positional view of strategy to an analysis of the activities underlying these positions

Porter moves from the cross-sectional problem to the longitudinal problem


Cross-sectional problem =
related to positions at one moment in time


Longitudinal problem =
how firms get into those positions

Porter's value chain (1985)

-  The idea is that there is margin (profit). This profit comes from the activities that a firm develops (primary and support activities).

Value drivers: gets you the differentiation

Cost drivers: gets you the low cost

General idea: if you want to have differentiation/low cost positions, it comes down to what a firm does.

Porter's overall idea of strategy (Cross sectional to longitudinal)

From cross-sectional to longitudinal problem
-  What are the ultimate causes in a longitudinal explanation?
--> Initial conditions
--> Managerial choices

Here we recognize Porter’s thinking in terms of structure and conduct:
-->  Initial conditions =
local competitive conditions (Porter’s Diamond)
-->  Managerial choices =
entrepreneurship (looking for new combinations, i.e.
innovation)


- ‘... the essence of strategy is choice.’

Porter 1996: what is strategy?

-  Operational effectiveness is not strategy

-  The essence of strategy is choosing to perform activities differently than competitors do

-  The entrepreneurial edge is finding new positions


- A sustainable strategic position requires trade-offs (they create the need for choice and purposefully limits what the company does)


-  Competitive advantage arises from fit across activities.

Resource-based view (High & Low church)

The High Church (stays very close to economic type reasoning; equilibrium thinking)
- Factor market competition (Barney)
- Core RBV (barney;Pateraf)

The Low Church (Aguments about: not resources (but capabilities) knowledge.
- Capabilities view (Diederickx)
- Knowledge-based view (grant)
- Dynamic Capabilities view (Teece)

Popular versions:
- Prahalad & Hamel (1990): core competencies
- Stalk et al. (1992): organizational capabilities

Ricardian logic of RBV

- Heterogeneous resources that are scarce and in fixed supply are a source of rent


-  Rent is an above normal return (a source of economic profit) that is ‘price determined

Assumptions land, labor, capital

-  Land is heterogeneous and in fixed supply
-  All markets are perfectly competitive
o Factor market for labor
o Factor market for capital
o Product market for end-products


-The most productive land is brought into production first

Note following about Land, Labor Capital

-  There is no monopoly power in the story (there is no artificial restriction of supply in the product market)

-  Therefore, there are no negative consequences to social welfare (value creation is maximized)

-  Ricardian rents are about the appropriation of value (how welfare is distributed)

-  Ricardian rents are ‘price determined’ (landowner A earns an economic profit without doing anything
– i.e. simply by virtue of owning the land).

How did landowners come to earn the land?

-  Landowner never paid the full economic costs for the resources


-  Having a heterogeneous resource for which you did not pay the full economic cost

Why would resources be inimitable?

  1. They can be fixed in supply
  2. They can be inelastic in supply
  3. They may be causally ambiguous
  4. They may be socially complex
  5. They may be path dependent (‘time compression diseconomies’)

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo