Lecture of Carlo Leget about this paper

10 important questions on Lecture of Carlo Leget about this paper

Which five distinct types of oppression could not be collapsed into more fundamental causes, and furthermore could not be reduced to dimensions of distributive justice?

  • Exploitation
  • Marginalization
  • Powerlessness
  • Cultural domination
  • Violence

What are the limits of virtue ethics (Lecture 1.57)

  • Emphasis on the personal (as opposed to social and cultural context)
  • May include intrusive requirements of self evaluation (as opposed to duty)
  • Overly self-regarding and
    • Locates moral motivation in rational, abstract and idealized conception of the good life rather than encounters with particular persons.


The difference with care-ethics is mostly about the area of practicing; virtue ethics is about the individual person's virtue and character. Care-ethics is more about the cases in practices in which different people are contributing to what a specific way of acting is.

What are the Commonalities with the ethics of care?

  • Ethical life is complex and cannot be reduced to abstract and universal principles
  • Rejection of simplistic dichotomy between reason and emotion
  • Not beginning with the assumption that all human beings are essential equal
  • Importance of emotions and interpersonal relationships to moral development
  • Opportunities for virtues in particular social contexts
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

What is the benefit of virtue-ethics to feminist-ethical oppressing issues?

Virtue ethics offers the best approach to ensuring that ethical theory correctly represents the conditions permitting vulnerable bodies to flourish in oppressive contexts.

What is supposed by Dillon in order to lift up virtual ethics in a wider area?

She wants to develop a "Feminist critical character ethics" as alternative to gendered and universal virtues: relationships of gender included.

What is very important to get a distinct and proper view about the validness of builded theories?

  • Is the theory open about presupposition?
  • Which structures are underlying at the theory?
  • Where does the thinking start?


The feminist ethical theory do have a particular methodological awareness of their preassumptions and context. Take nothing for granted anymore, but take notice of the underlying structures and presumptions of a theory. Even and in particular if they are not noticed very explicit.

What did Aristotle says about doing ethical research?

You have to know the reality of the material you are working withs and if you doing ethics you have to become acquainted with the context and the costums and the local things that are important to people, because this is your raw material. How do actions, how do people search for the good life in real life for that you can use empirical research. This is a notion for empirical research, as a way to be closer to the lived reality.

Try to formulate three Critiques about the Kantian, deontology approach to feminist ethics

  • Universal principles are prioritized over morally relevant embodied experiences, particularities and relationships; doing this you will lose a lot of detail and context, which are important in real life.
  • Capacities for rationality are separated from capacities for emotion (associated with women or feminity); Marten Nussbaum; Emotions also have their own rationality and therefore an access to knowledge to rational structures.
  • Overidealizing moral agents’ capacities for rationality and choice.

What is the difference between virtue ethics and care-ethics?

Virtue ethics is focused on the person – care ethicists don’t think that they are just virtue ethicists, because virtue ethicists is much more focused on the personal virtue of the person. Care ethicists do more and different bother about the practical life in which different people act in a proper way and contribute the good to specific goals within the practical area of social environment or labour.

Regarding the social contractarianism, freedom is not neutral or easy  - in what way?

It is related and connected to our bodily existence and the way we are part of a specific context.
It is an abstraction from the concrete reality and contextuality.  There are in this imaginary no place for disabled people, caregivers, or children.
The example of the refugees shows also a lack of this thought experiment - there is no point of nowhere in essence. Always have to consider and discount the gender, the dependency and embodiment to the social locations and between bodies.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo