The free trade umpire: the European Court of Justice and judicial activism
5 important questions on The free trade umpire: the European Court of Justice and judicial activism
The problems associated with addressing trade restrictions through harmonization did not go unnoticed by the ECJ, which has often used its judicial power for the purposes of what?
Confronted by restrictions on their ability to operate across national borders, firms began to seek redress through the Community legal system. What was the Court asked to determine?
National measures that negatively impact trade were therefore prohibited. This was softened by the recognition that what?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
The notion of equivalence of national regulations which this ruling (ik: this ruling gaat over Cassis de Dijon) introduced, opened up the possibility that harmonization would not always be necessary for the construction of a single market. This was the crucial step in launching a new regulatory strategy, mutual recognition, which would make for an easier circulation of trade and commerce in the Community. What does mutual recognition imply?
In fact, the Court argued that derogations from (or exceptions to) the free trade rule for the purposes of public health, fair competition, and consumer protection were possible, but that they had to be based upon what?
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding