Summary: U2-3) Bail And Preventive Detention; The Charging Decision

Study material generic cover image
  • This + 400k other summaries
  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 63 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.
Use this summary
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo

Read the summary and the most important questions on U2-3) Bail and Preventive Detention; The Charging Decision

  • 1 U2) Bail and Preventive Detention

    This is a preview. There are 53 more flashcards available for chapter 1
    Show more cards here

  • FRCP 5.1. Preliminary [probable cause] hearing

    Required for all non-petty offenses. Can be waived by D or not held if D is indicted by a grand jury, or the government files an "information."
  • Stack v Boyle (US 1951)

    A federal court must set bail in a manner that furthers the purposes of bail. Also, the judge cannot impose a financial condition that will result in the detention of D.
  • Bail Reform Act (1984)

    Requires the court to consider both (1) risk to public safety posed by accused's release and (2) flight risk. If the court finds no combination of conditions is adequate, it must order the accused's pretrial detention
  • BRA (1984) - Preventive Detention Standard

    Can detain only if [a] all other options will not assure his appearance, [b] if there is a risk of obstruction of justice, or [c] if there is a danger to the community.If it is not a violent crime or drug offense, the judge cannot invoke the (c) "dangerousness" reason to support preventive detention
  • BRA - Presumption in favor of least restrictive condition

    There is a presumption in favor of the least restrictive condition that will ensure D's appearance and protect public safety. Burden of proving the necessity of conditions or detention is on the prosecution.
  • FRCP 48(a) - Dismissal by the Government

    The government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint. The government may NOT dismiss the prosecution during trial without the D's consent.
  • FRCP 48(b) - Dismissal by the Court

    The judge may dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint if necessary delay occurs in (1) presenting a charge to a grand jury, (2) filing an information against a D, or (3) bringing a D to trial.
  • Must the prosecution sign an indictment preferred by a grand jury?

    No. See FRCP 7(c)(1) (attorney for the government must sign the indictment in order for it to be valid.
  • Selective Prosecution - Constitutional Limitations

    Generally, a charge of selective enforcement (prosecution) will be sustained only where the party shows that the prosecution violated Equal Protection CL. by acting on impermissible motives such as race or religion
  • Armstrong - Equal Protection Analysis of Selective Prosecution Claims: What must D show [BOP: Clear and convincing evidence] to make out a prima facie case

    (1) Discriminatory Effect. 
    (2) Discriminatory Purpose. 
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 63 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.

To read further, please click:

Read the full summary
This summary +380.000 other summaries A unique study tool A rehearsal system for this summary Studycoaching with videos
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Topics related to Summary: U2-3) Bail And Preventive Detention; The Charging Decision