More questions

23 important questions on More questions

Name three groups that were denied the freedoms of the English, American and French declarations of rights. What precisely were they denied? Why was France considered to have ‘carried the torch of freedom further than any other country’?

Property less male citizens and all women were considered to be secondary citizens and were therefore denied voting rights and political participation. Women’s legal status was subjugated to the authority of their husbands. Slavery was common and the rights of indigenous populations in European colonies were violated. Civil rights of Jews were denied. France was considered to have carried the torch of freedom further than any other country as it was the first country to free slaves, decriminalize homosexual activity and emancipate Jews. Its revolutionary agenda involved ‘granting minority rights and freeing all repressed nationalities.’

What according to Hugo Grotius was considered just war? What types of war were forbidden according to natural law?

Grotius defined just war as ‘wars waged for defense, recovery of property and punishment of the unjust’. Preventative war undertaken because of fear of an imminent attack was also according to him legitimate. According to natural law wars to get others’ property, wars that subjected people to force because they were believed to be deserving of slavery, wars that inhibited religious differences and wars based on expediency not necessity were forbidden.

What was the treaty of Westphalia? What date was it ratified? How did John Locke extend the views of the treaty?

In the late sixteenth- seventeenth century, the rise of Protestantism threatened the then predominant Catholicism and led to a number religious wars throughout Europe. The treaty of Westphalia was the treaty that put an end to the religious wars. It was ratified in October 1648. It did not grant the right to individual religious freedom , but it did give the right to religious asylum and the right for states to choose their own religion. John Locke however called for the individual right to select a religion
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart

Name three factors that contributed to the rise of the West and its capacity to develop and diffuse a modern discourse of Human Rights. How did they contribute?

The Protestant reformation was one factor as the Protestants highlighted individual responsibility which led to a new credo relying on individual choice and rights. The scientific revolution was another factor as it also contributed to the belief of the value of individuals and their capacity to reason. The rise of the middle class or bourgeoisie was also an important development as their clash with the monarchy fueled the English, American and French revolutions, which aided in the development of human rights.

What is the difference between a positive and a negative right? Should one of them receive priority over the other?

Negative rights involve restraint while positive rights involve positive actions- others to actually provide something such as goods, services or opportunities. Some argue that negative rights deserve priority since their violation involves direct infliction of injury opposed to positive rights which if violated only result in the loss of a benefit. However, if violated both can result in the same consequences- e.g. death- therefore neither deserves priority over the other.

Do human rights apply to groups or to individuals? Why?

Human rights only apply to individuals, not groups. This is the case because only human beings can have human rights and only individuals are human beings. Therefore, only individuals can have human rights. Collectivities have many rights, but not human rights. However, it is important to note that human rights are rooted in the social context- many can only be exercised and often only enjoyed in groups. However, the rights are still held by the individuals of the group and applicable to these individuals, not to the group itself.

What according to Francis Fukuyama is the reason for the staying power of human rights in world affairs? Name two criticisms of his view.

According to Francis Fukuyama all people have a drive to be respected and the idea of human rights is the ultimate form of personal respect. Therefore, the ideal (not imperfect practice) of human rights is the most perfect form of contribution to human dignity. However, some have commented that Fukuyama’s view of human rights is too secular and universal and therefore it demeans local cultures and religions that give meaning to many people. Also, even pragmatic liberals believe that human rights is only one means , not necessarily the most significant one in achieving human dignity.

What did Kant's 'Perceptual Peace' entail?

Kant laid out a proposal for a confederation of nations to resolve conflicts. He also offered preventive and restraining measures to be adopted prior to or during wartime, such as the abolition of standing armies, the prohibition of foreign debts, the endorsement of less predatory regimes (such those with republican constitution) and the proscription of wars of extermination that would make perpetual peace possible only 'on the vast graveyard of the human race'.

Msg_txtwhat was John Locke's argument on the right to private property?

msg_txteveryman has a property in his person,right to himself ,his body and 
the work of his hand.he maintained that the rights to life and property 
were inalienable rights of nature that the state, to gain moral 
legitimacy had to secure.

Msg_txtHow did the English Levellers define the "right to private property?" (Ishay)

msg_txt"Property earned as the fruits of one's labor is sacred under the biblical injunction 'thou shall not steal.'"

text-decorationEN-GBwhat are the 3 special features of human rights? Describe them?

text-decorationEN-GBtext-decoration

EN-GBHuman rights are the rights that one has simply because one is a human being. They are:

EN-GB1.Equality:EN-GB one either is or is not a human being and therefore has the same human rights than every other human being.

EN-GB2.Inalienable: EN-GBone cannot stop being human,no matter how badly one behaves nor how barbarously one is treated.

EN-GB3.Universal: EN-GBin the sense that today we consider all members of species human beings, and therefore holders of human rights.

Why was the definition of private property considered so important?

Some rights, such as the one to vote, were granted only to private property owners or those who had a certain salary and therefore could have a private property. Therefore, clearly stating the definition of private property meant deciding who could vote.

What is the importance of Confucianism in China?

Confucianism was the profound idea that all Chinese had to follow (and even still follow. It consisted of Honor and Harmony. I believe that the respect they showed one another through Confucianism is the first step to Human Rights.

Why is Hugo Grotius such an important figure in the history of International relations and Human Rights?

He called on heads of states to restrain violence for reasons of humanity and freedom of religion. He argued that state heads had to first avail themselves of negotiations and diplomacy. Military actions must be used only for the right reasons.

Msg_txtWhat was the Paris Commune and what did they fight for?

msg_txtIn 1871,french socialists and  anarchists set up a  revoluitionary municipal council, the paris commune. they took over the  streets of paris,challenging wealthy bourgeoisie, aristocrats and the  clergy while demanding government control over prices and wages,as well  as better working conditions.the communards demanded rights for the  working class,the development of worker's cooperatives, a reduction of  working hours, free public education for all children, professional  education for young workers, and housing rights.

Msg_txt
What were the goals of the republican party that the workers supported ? 

msg_txtThe destruction of slavery and the enhancement of free wage labor in Northern industries.

Anti-Slavery

the different approaches to slavery. Northern States were all about the destruction of slavery and the enhancement of free wage labor, whereas Southern states' economy depended on slavery. In 1820 the Missouri Compromise was reached, which required that for each slave-owning state admitted to the union, a non-slaving-owning state would be admitted.

Msg_txt
what is the most powerful international organization for human rights? 

msg_txtthe OECD ,the organization for economic coorporation and development.

What is the core idea of liberalism in HR?

As the book states, the core idea, of both the classical and pragmatic, liberalism is the respect of personal moral rights that are linked to the equal worth of individuals.

mso-ansiEN-USWhat did the First Reform Bill and the Chartists call for?

In 1832, the First reform Bill was passed, which widened male suffrage. It was conservative and continued to exclude workers from political participation and therefore the Chartists drafted a People’s Charter which called for equal representation, universal suffrage, the abolition of property qualifications, annual reelection of parliaments and vote by secret ballot. Their petition was however rebuffed in 1838 and only in the following century were universal male suffrage and women’s voting rights granted.

mso-ansiEN-USHow did rights for education develop? Where were the rights for education declared mso-spacerun in the twentieth century?

The call for public education and educational reforms resulted in order to counter claims that only educated citizens should vote. Indeed, Marx and Engels called for the right of children to a free public education. By the end of the nineteenth century the importance of education was realized for democracy and technologically advanced manufacturing and therefore elementary education became free and compulsory. In the twentieth century, Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 13 of the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural rights declared that childhood education was a fundamental human right.

According to the liberals, what can encourage peace? Why?

Free commerce was seen as an effective way to encourage peace; because, according to the liberals, it would spread republican states and therefore create a network of interdependence. This network would help prevent wars because states needed one-another and because democratic states would not go to war against one another.

mso-ansiEN-ZAEN-ZAWhat were two arguments given against the cost-effectiveness of slavery?

EN-ZAIn 1776 Adam Smith argued that free workers would be more cost effective than slaves since workers would own property and therefore would be more invested in making produce greater (so that their own proportion may be so) than a slave who ‘consults his own ease by making the land produce as little as possible over and above that maintenance.’ Furthermore, during the first decades of the nineteenth century, labour-saving agricultural machinery as well as other changes affecting the economy of agriculture highlighted that slave labour was not so cost effective.

The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:

  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo