Lawmaking and treaty interpretation
4 important questions on Lawmaking and treaty interpretation
Legel effects of General Assembly resolutions
(synonyms used for resolution in the charter: recommendations, decisions, declarations.)
sometimes resolutions have normative value
- opinio iuris
- can help in establishing customary law
- establish state practice
- proof of opinio iuris
- the way states vote can be helpful in determine customary international law
- critical note: voting is politically and economically based, not necessarily law-based
- subsequent agreement/practice (art. 31(3) VCLT)
SC resolutions v. IO's legal orders
EXCEPT
- art. 103 Charter
- obligations under the charter prevail
- 30(6) VCLT
- obligations under the charter prevail
UN Charter/ SC resolutions v. EU-law
dilemma: follow international law and ignore fundamental rights or respect the fundamental rights?
the court champions fundamental rights. The EU is an important organization that respects fundamental rights and those have to be reviewed --> constitutional foundations of the EU system
Fundamental rights are emphasized, the EU resolution must comply with fundamental rights.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Interpretation methods; treaty interpretation
- objective method
- looking at the objectives in the text itself
- ''ordinary meaning'' (31 VCLT)
- teleological method
- looking at the purpose of the treaty
- ''object and purpose''/ ''annexes and preambles''
- subjective method
- preparatory work to conform the meaning
- court cannot be all too creative with this method
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding