Crane & Matten (2010/16) - Non-Consequentialist Theories - Duty/Kantian ethics
5 important questions on Crane & Matten (2010/16) - Non-Consequentialist Theories - Duty/Kantian ethics
In the ethics of duty/kantian ethics, it is suggested that there are categorical imperatives (from Immanuel Kant). What does this suggest?
What is the main principle of this theory, of the categorical imperative framework through which the principles can be derived? Also Maxim 1. Does the action reflect the aspect of consistency?
What does the main principle of this theory mean? In terms of that you should universalise the act?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
What is the best way to approach this theory? What questions should you ask yourself in order to determine whether or not something is right or wrong?
What are the other 2 parts of the categorical imperative?
Maxim 3: Act only so that the will through its maxims could regard itself at the same time as universally lawgiving.
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding