Summary: Griskevicius Et Al. 2012 - Week 3 Efb
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on Griskevicius et al. 2012 - Week 3 EFB
-
2 Griskevicius et al, 2012
This is a preview. There are 2 more flashcards available for chapter 2
Show more cards here -
What do the authors do from their evolutionary perspective on behaviour? What question is linked to this?
How might a given behaviour have helped our ancestors to survive or reproduce? -
When explaining behaviour a distinction is made between which 2 things and shortly illustrate them both?
Proximate behaviour: culture,incentives , preferences, learning, utility, pleasure, values, personality etc.- Ultimate behaviour: Evolutionary bases.
-
When looking at a kid that prefers a donut over broccoli, how is this explained from a proximate behaviour and from ultimate behaviour?
Proximate behaviour: because it tastes better.
Ultimate behaviour: humans have inherited a disposition to crave fatty foods, they provided our ancestors with high calories which were needed to survive. -
2.1 Pre-dispositions
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2.1
Show more cards here -
We have inherited pre-dispositions which enabled our ancestors to survive but they contribute to ecological degradation in the present world. Which 5 are these?
- Propensity for
self-interest . - Desire for relative status.
- Tendency to unconsciously copy others.
- Temporal
discounting; predisposition to be short-sighted. - Tendency to disregard
impalpable concerns.
- Propensity for
-
What do they argue by applying the evolutionary perspective and looking at the pre-dispositions?
If you want to stimulate more sustainable behaviour, you should match your strategy to these evolutionary pre-dispositions. -
2.1.1 Propensity for self-interest
-
What is the first pre-disposition about, which is called: Propensity (tendency) for self-interest? What are the three principles?
- Kin selection:
- Survival and
replication of genes (humans have apropensity toprioritise thereplication of their own genes).
- Reciprocal altruism:
- Cooperation with
non-kin only if they (expect to) reciprocate or to gain reputation. - Indirect reciprocity:
- Helping strangers to gain a reputation for being cooperative which is associated with increased status in a social hierarchy and more opportunties for alliances.
-
What is the tendency of this pre-disposition?
People prioritize self-interst over group behavior. -
What are solutions to link this to more sustainable behaviour?
Highlight individual benefits to a person's genetic self-interest- Create small dense social
networks resembling ancestral groups Threaten reputations and foster group identities Donate first to create obligation, then ask toreciprocate (do something in return)
-
What is an example of a strategy to get people to behave more sustainably?
Emphasise own kin, children or grandchildren but not future generations. E.g. Urge people to conserve water because there otherwise might not be enough for their children and grandchildren. -
2.1.2 Desire for relative status
This is a preview. There are 4 more flashcards available for chapter 2.1.2
Show more cards here -
What is the main reason behind the pre-disposition: Desire for relative status?
Relative status improves reproductive opportunities.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Topics related to Summary: Griskevicius Et Al. 2012 - Week 3 Efb
-
Introduction - Why do firms join self-regulatory institutions? - Institutional pressures
-
Introduction - Why do firms join self-regulatory institutions? - Strategic choice
-
Introduction - Are self-regulatory initiatives effective?
-
Griskevicius et al, 2012 - Pre-dispositions - Propensity for self-interest
-
Griskevicius et al, 2012 - Pre-dispositions - Desire for relative status
-
Griskevicius et al, 2012 - Pre-dispositions - Social imitation
-
Griskevicius et al, 2012 - Pre-dispositions - Future discounting
-
Griskevicius et al, 2012 - Pre-dispositions - Ignore impalpable concerns
-
Selsky & Parker, 2005 - Trisector partnerships - Implementation Phase
-
Selsky & Parker, 2005 - Trisector partnerships - Outcome Phase
-
Georgallis & Lee, 2020 - Moral Markets
-
Cohen & Winn, 2007 - Market Imperfections - Firms are not perfectly efficient
-
Cohen & Winn, 2007 - Market Imperfections - Externalities exist
-
Cohen & Winn, 2007 - Market Imperfections - Market imperfection opportunities