Summary: Work Psychology (Psy09700)

Study material generic cover image
  • This + 400k other summaries
  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Use this summary
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo

Read the summary and the most important questions on WORK PSYCHOLOGY (PSY09700)

  • 1 What is Work Psychology Anyway

  • What is Work & Occupational Psychology?

    Protected titles across the world    
    • Occupational psychology (used in UK)  
    • Industrial psychology (more popular in the USA)
    • Organisational psychology  
    • Organisational behaviour  

    -Interchangeable… but subtle differences 
    -The focus of Occupational is individual. The focus of organisational starts with collectives 
  • When did work start?  19th century

    • It depends on what you count as ‘work’    
    • Work ‘as we know it’…  
      • Industrial Revolution   
        • 19th century, welfare --> Factory Acts in UK    
    • Psychology ‘as we know it’…  
      • Developments in ‘scientific’ and experimental methodologies in psychology – 1870s  
      • Some ‘bumps’ along the way  
      • Applied to work – from the early 20th century   
  • 2 Selection Part I - How do we do

    This is a preview. There are 10 more flashcards available for chapter 2
    Show more cards here

  • Standards for Effectiveness (3) - RELIABILITY & INTERPRETABILITY

    RELIABILITY
    -Test-retest
    -Over diff, time periods

    -Inter-rater reliability
    -Degree of agreement between multiple raters: e.g. interviews
    Improved by structured scoring systems

    -Internal consistency
    -Items within test itself

    INTERPRETABILITY
    -Criterion-based
    -Usually fail-pass against a pre-set market E.g. driving test

    -Norm-based
    -Compares scores to those of other groups of people (norms)
    E.g. above/ below average, % scores or sten scores
    -Important to know what norms are available
  • Standards for Effectiveness (3) - Add. Notes

    Internal consistency used to check that different parts of the test are measuring the same thing.

    A sten score indicates an individual's approximate position (as a range of values) with respect to the population of values and, therefore, to other people in that population.
  • Standards for Effectiveness (4) - Utility

    Utility
    Fairness /equality
    It is most important to remember that, at the point of selection, all applicants must be judged equally on a job-related basis. Discrimination at the point of selection is unlawful.
    -Equality & Human Rights Commission
    -Need to demonstrate link to job performance

    Cost
    -Pull on organisational resources
    -Developing in-house test vs. buying from test publishers
    -In-house training vs external consultant

    Practicality
  • Selection – Prelim Overview

    • Selection practices & theory driven by the Predictive/ Systematic Model
    • Central emphasis placed on organisation’s needs & criterion-related predictive validity
      • Ability of measure to predict a future criterion (job performance)

    • Model offers:
      • Possibility of a ‘sure and certain’ positive decision
      • Possibility of scientific, objective decision
      • Possibility of neutral, fair decision
  • 3 Selection Part II - Taking a psychological approach to

    This is a preview. There are 31 more flashcards available for chapter 3
    Show more cards here

  • Psychometrics - Ability Tests (1)

    General Mental Ability (GMA) psychometric term for intelligence
    • Strong evidence of criterion-related validity for job performance (up to .64) & training (up to .74) Ones et al (2005)
    • Evidence across jobs & countries: e.g. Salgado et al. (2003)
    • But…Still controversy over adoption in practice: validity-diversity dilemma (e.g. Personnel Psychology vol 61(1)

    Specialized ability tests
    • Wide range for specific requirements
    • Validity evidence usually via test publishers
    • but see Ones et al (2005) for review
  • Work Sample  - Summary

    Work Sample has high face validity.
  • Throwing out baby with bathwater? [discard something valuable along with other things that are undesirable]

    1. Can decision-making ever be completely rational? Would we want it to be?
    2. Some ‘biases’ are important for job outcomes (Dipboye, 2005) 
    3. Increasing structure means restricting dialogue & flexibility
    4. Interview needs to be a two-way process
    5. Fairness in testing & perceived fairness of process can differ
  • Interview – Summary & Tensions

    an idiomatic expression for an avoidable error in which something good is eliminated when trying to get rid of something bad

To read further, please click:

Read the full summary
This summary +380.000 other summaries A unique study tool A rehearsal system for this summary Studycoaching with videos
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart