Implied Co-ownership - Comparison of Resulting and Constructive Trusts
4 important questions on Implied Co-ownership - Comparison of Resulting and Constructive Trusts
How are the non-legal owner's shares determined for a constructive trust and why does that differ from a resulting trust?
How does the case of Drake v Whipp explain how the non-legal owner's shares are determined for a constructive trust?
Explain how the case of Stack v Dowden criticised the case of Lloyds Bank v Rosset thart only 'direct contributions towards the purchase price' will suffice?
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Explain how the case of Laskar v Laskar shows how constructive trusts have not totally superseded resulting trusts?
The question on the page originate from the summary of the following study material:
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
![Trustpilot Logo](/images/design_2020/lp/clp-trustpilot-en.png)