Summary: Ws4 Free Movement Of Goods
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on WS4 Free Movement of Goods
-
1 STEP 1: WHAT IS THE RELEVANT LEGISLATION
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 1
Show more cards here -
Which two restrictive measures are prohibited under Article 34 TFEU in protecting free movement of goods?
Articles 34prohibits quantitative restrictions (QR - e.g., anoutright ban or a quota) on imports and allmeasures havingequivalent effect (MEQR ) = measure requireing to change the product -
What is the definition of 'goods' in Commission v Italy Art Treasure?
Goods are defined as anything withmonetary value that can form thebasis of acommercial transaction . -
2 STEP 2: STATE THE TYPE OF RESTRICTION?
-
2.2.1 Distinctly applicable MEQRs
-
What is the definition of distinctly applicable MEQRs? Ars the rules applied equally on imported and domestic goods?
Rules or laws thatdiscriminate againstimported goods and notdomestic goods. -
2.2.1.1 Case law
-
Explain how publicity campaign in promoting Irish goods (Commission v Ireland (Buy Irish)) directly hindered trade?
TheIrish government wanted topromote Irish goods through apublicity campaign by theIrish GoodsCouncil .- The court held that no actual
hindrance to trade was required, but apotential to affect trade. - Even
non-binding statemeasures couldinfluence theconduct oftraders
- The court held that no actual
-
Explain why the rule which targeted non-Irish products was a distinctly applicable measure in (Commission v Ireland (Irish Souvenirs)?
AnIrish lawprohibited theimports ofIrish souvenirsunless thesouvenirs weremarked as 'foreign '. TheECJ held thatconsumers do not need to know where theproducts came from, nor do they need to belabelled asforeign . -
2.2.2 Indistinctly applicable QRs
-
What is the definition of indistinctly applicable measures?
Applies todomestic andimported goods so on theface of it there is nodistinction but actually has agreater impact onimported products . -
2.3 SELLING ARRANGEMENTS
-
What is the definition of a selling arrangement in (Keck v Mountford)
Selling arrangements focus on HOW theproduct is sold and NOT the product ITSELF.It governs who cansell theproducts , when, where and how. -
What 2 requirements must be fulfilled for the selling arrangement to fall outside of the definition of a MEQR under art. 34?
Article 34 will not apply if the pure selling arrangements isnon-discriminatory and as long as:- The law
applies to all tradersoperating in thenational territory - The law
affects themarketing ofdomestic products andimports from otherMSs in the same way
- The law
-
2.3.1 Case law
This is a preview. There are 2 more flashcards available for chapter 2.3.1
Show more cards here -
Why was shop opening hours considered a selling arrangement in Punto Casa v Capena and not a MEQR in art. 34?
TheECJ held thatArticle 34 did notapply to shopopening hours and days and such laws arepurely selling arrangements . -
Explain why the law on where baby milk could be sold was a selling arrangement in Commission v Greece?
A law providing thatbaby milk could only be sold inpharmacies related to aselling arrangemen t.
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Topics related to Summary: Ws4 Free Movement Of Goods
-
STEP 1: WHAT IS THE RELEVANT LEGISLATION
-
STEP 2: STATE THE MEASURE? - SELLING ARRANGEMENTS - Case law
-
SELLING ARRANGEMENTS - Law are not selling arrangements when it hinders importers - Case law
-
STEP 3: DEFENCES - DISTINCTLY APPLICABLE FOR BOTH QRs AND MEQRs ARE ONLY JUSTIFIABLE BY ARTICLE
-
STEP 3: DEFENCES - INDISTINCTLY APPLICABLE MEQRs = BOTH ARTICLE 36 + FURTHER DEFENCE CASSIS DE DIJON - Rule of Reason