Summary: Ws7 Abuse Of A Dominant Position
- This + 400k other summaries
- A unique study and practice tool
- Never study anything twice again
- Get the grades you hope for
- 100% sure, 100% understanding
Read the summary and the most important questions on WS7 Abuse of a dominant position
-
2 STEP 2: Define the relevant market
-
2.1 Relevant Product Market (RPM)
-
What two keywords are mentioned in the Commission Notice 1997 which define the RPM?
The Commission defined theRPM as 'products/services that areinterchangeable orsubstitutable by theconsumer , by reasons of the products'characteristics (a very specilsits/unique, and non interchangebale product ) , prices andintended use'. -
2.1.1 Demand Substitution
-
Explain what demand substitution considers in relation to the interchangeability of two products?
Demand substitution considers whether aconsumer of product A wouldbuy product B if theprice of product Aincreased . -
How does the SSNIP test determine whether consumers are likely to change to another product? Does it take an economic approach?
The SSNIP test considers whether a small but lasting increase in the relative price (5-10%) in product A would result in product A's consumers switching to substitutes such as product B -
2.1.2 Supply Substitution
-
Is it necessary for competitors to have the ability to easily and cost-effectively switch to another related product under supply substitution?
-Supply substitution considers how easilycompetitors canswitch production to the relevant products of the dominant business
- withoutincurring any significant additionalcosts andrisks . -
Explain why a canning company for preserved food had a high degree of supply substitution with competitors and was not found to be in a dominant position in (Continental Cans)?
Acanning company wasdeemed to have adominant position in thepreserved food market. Onappeal , thecans were highlysubstitutable ascompetitors could easily alter machinery to enter the market with little cost. -
In contrast, explain why the three different markets for computer software systems were not substitutable and very difficult to enter in (Microsoft v Commission [2007])
Entry into this market was difficult as it involved significanttime ,money andresearch . -
2.1.3 RPM Can Be Very Narrow/Niche (Hugin)
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2.1.3
Show more cards here -
Why did Hugin - a cash register manufacturer - have a market dominance for spare parts in (Hugin)?
Severalcompanies have been unable to serviceHugin registers due toHugin refusing to supply parts.Hugin had adominant position in the spare parts market since onlyHugin's spare parts could be used inHugin registers . -
2.2 Relevant Geographic market (RGM)
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2.2
Show more cards here -
Explain the general rule in relation to what initially constitutes the RGM and are there limiting factors that might limit the scope of the EU as a whole? Hilti?
The generalrule is to always start with the whole of theEU unless limiting factors suggest otherwise, i.e., to narrow the market. -
What are the limiting factors mentioned in (Commission/United Brands) that narrow the RGM to a more specific geographic region?
High transportation costs- Product
characteristics -fragility andperishability preventshipment ? - Shipment - significant
shipments of a certain product to a specific area National tendencies/preferences -consumers from A states have different spendinghabits thanconsumers in B states
(SHIPMENT + NATIONAL TENDENCIES CAN BE DISCUSSED TOGETHER!) -
3 STEP 3: Does the undertaking have dominance in the market?
-
3.1 Market Share
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 3.1
Show more cards here -
Explain what is meant by 'very large market shares' in Hoffman LaRoche v Commission? Does anything below 50% count as 'large market shares' AKZO Chemie v Commission?
'Verylarge marketshares ' are rarely below 35% and marketshares above 50% frequently give rise todominance .
- Higher grades + faster learning
- Never study anything twice
- 100% sure, 100% understanding