Summary: Ws7 Abuse Of A Dominant Position

Study material generic cover image
  • This + 400k other summaries
  • A unique study and practice tool
  • Never study anything twice again
  • Get the grades you hope for
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 38 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.
Use this summary
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven.
Trustpilot Logo

Read the summary and the most important questions on WS7 Abuse of a dominant position

  • 2 STEP 2: Define the relevant market

  • 2.1 Relevant Product Market (RPM)

  • What two keywords are mentioned in the Commission Notice 1997 which define the RPM?

    The Commission defined the RPM as 'products/services that are interchangeable or substitutable by the consumer, by reasons of the products' characteristics (a very specilsits/unique, and non interchangebale product ), prices and intended use'.
  • 2.1.1 Demand Substitution

  • Explain what demand substitution considers in relation to the interchangeability of two products?

    Demand substitution considers whether a consumer of product A would buy product B if the price of product A increased.
  • How does the SSNIP test determine whether consumers are likely to change to another product? Does it take an economic approach? 

    The SSNIP test considers whether a small but lasting increase in the relative price (5-10%) in product A would result in product A's consumers switching to substitutes such as product B 
  • 2.1.2 Supply Substitution

  • Is it necessary for competitors to have the ability to easily and cost-effectively switch to another related product under supply substitution?

    - Supply substitution considers how easily competitors can switch production to the relevant products of the dominant business

    - without incurring any significant additional costs and risks.
  • Explain why a canning company for preserved food had a high degree of supply substitution with competitors and was not found to be in a dominant position in (Continental Cans)?

    A canning company was deemed to have a dominant position in the preserved food market. On appeal, the cans were highly substitutable as competitors could easily alter machinery to enter the market with little cost.
  • In contrast, explain why the three different markets for computer software systems were not substitutable and very difficult to enter in (Microsoft v Commission [2007])

    Entry into this market was difficult as it involved significant time, money and research.
  • 2.1.3 RPM Can Be Very Narrow/Niche (Hugin)

    This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2.1.3
    Show more cards here

  • Why did Hugin - a cash register manufacturer - have a market dominance for spare parts in (Hugin)?

    Several companies have been unable to service Hugin registers due to Hugin refusing to supply parts. Hugin had a dominant position in the spare parts market since only Hugin's spare parts could be used in Hugin registers.
  • 2.2 Relevant Geographic market (RGM)

    This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2.2
    Show more cards here

  • Explain the general rule in relation to what initially constitutes the RGM and are there limiting factors that might limit the scope of the EU as a whole? Hilti?

    The general rule is to always start with the whole of the EU unless limiting factors suggest otherwise, i.e., to narrow the market.
  • What are the limiting factors mentioned in (Commission/United Brands) that narrow the RGM to a more specific geographic region?

    • High transportation costs
    • Product characteristics - fragility and perishability prevent shipment?
    • Shipment - significant shipments of a certain product to a specific area
    • National tendencies/preferences - consumers from A states have different spending habits than consumers in B states



    (SHIPMENT + NATIONAL TENDENCIES CAN BE DISCUSSED TOGETHER!)
  • 3 STEP 3: Does the undertaking have dominance in the market?

  • 3.1 Market Share

    This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 3.1
    Show more cards here

  • Explain what is meant by 'very large market shares' in Hoffman LaRoche v Commission? Does anything below 50% count as 'large market shares' AKZO Chemie v Commission?

    'Very large market shares' are rarely below 35% and market shares above 50% frequently give rise to dominance.
PLEASE KNOW!!! There are just 38 flashcards and notes available for this material. This summary might not be complete. Please search similar or other summaries.

To read further, please click:

Read the full summary
This summary +380.000 other summaries A unique study tool A rehearsal system for this summary Studycoaching with videos
  • Higher grades + faster learning
  • Never study anything twice
  • 100% sure, 100% understanding
Discover Study Smart